USPTO serial 76027428
LOCUSCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2763135Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOCUSCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H3B 1A7, CA
Montreal, Quebec H3B 1A7, CA
Montreal, Quebec H3B 1A7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Rosini
Judith R.S. Stern Wolf Greenfield & Sacks600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS HARDWARE FOR THE TRANSFER OF TELEPHONE CALLS USING VOICE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SOFTWARE ENABLING THE OPERATION OF SYSTEMS HARDWARE USING THE VOICE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY TROUBLESHOOTING PROBLEMS OF SOFTWARE ENABLING THE OPERATION OF SYSTEMS HARDWARE USING THE VOICE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY; CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING AUTOMATIC VOICE ACTIVATED SYSTEMS HARDWARE FOR THE TRANSFER OF TELEPHONE CALLS USING VOICE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY AND SOFTWARE ENABLING THE OPERATION OF SYSTEMS HARDWARE USING THE VOICE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING PROBLEMS OF AUTOMATIC VOICE ACTIVATED SYSTEMS HARDWARE FOR THE TRANSFER OF TELEPHONE CALLS USING VOICE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Locus Dialogue Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Locus Dialogue Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Locus Dialogue Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LOCUSCARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |