USPTO serial 76028040
TAPESTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 3, 2002
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TAPESTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ST. PAUL, MN
Micro Component Technology, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Micro Component Technology, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Micro Component Technology, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J ZUBKE
DAVID J ZUBKE BEST & FLANAGAN LLP4000 US BANK PL601 2ND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4331Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automated parallel test handling and thermal conditioning systems, namely an input module for devices in panel, strip or wafer format, a temperature range test module and an output module for testing and grading of semiconductors and other integrated circuits and devices during the manufacturing process | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MCT WORLDWIDE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Micro Component Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Micro Component Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Micro Component Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TAPESTRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |