USPTO serial 76028115
STUPID DRIVERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STUPID DRIVERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Baker
MARK A BAKER MARK A BAKER, PC1447 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 414ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely providing a website featuring information in the field of safe and poor automobile operation activities and techniques via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely providing a continuing television programming content in the field of safe and poor automobile operation activities and techniques broadcasted over global computer networks; entertainment services, namely a continuing informational and comedic show providing examples of safe and poor automobile operation activities and techniques for distribution over television, satellite, audio and video media; entertainmentservices, namely film production providing informational and comedic examples of safe and poor automobile driving activities and techniques for distribution through motion picture theaters and video media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |