USPTO serial 76028136
ORIMAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY, TODD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORIMAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton A. Amernick
BURTON A AMERNICK CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP1990 M ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AGRICULTURAL MACHINES; BENDING MACHINES; COMPACTING MACHINES, NAMELY, EARTH COMPACTING MACHINES, CONCRETE COMPACTING MACHINES, CEMENT COMPACTING MACHINES, ROAD COMPACTING MACHINES, ASPHALT COMPACTING MACHINES, AND PAVEMENT COMPACTING MACHINES; CUTTING MACHINES, NAMELY METAL CUTTING MACHINES, ASPHALT CUTTING MACHINES, AND ROAD CUTTING MACHINES; FINISHING MACHINES, NAMELY SURFACE FINISHING MACHINES AND CONCRETE FINISHING MACHINES; FOOD PROCESSING MACHINES; GRINDING MACHINES; LIFTING APPARATUS; METAL WORKING MACHINES; MILLING MACHINES; MIXING MACHINES; ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR MACHINES; PACKAGING MACHINES; POWER TOOLS; PUMPS; ROAD MAKING MACHINES; SPRAYING MACHINES; TAMPING MACHINES; HANDLING APPARATUS FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING; TRIMMING MACHINES, NAMELY, METAL TRIMMING MACHINES, WOOD TRIMMING MACHINES, AND PLANTS TRIMMING MACHINES; AERATORS; AIR COMPRESSING MACHINES; CONCRETE MIXERS; CONCRETE VIBRATING MACHINES; CONCRETE/CEMENT POWER TROWELS; CULTIVATORS; DRILLING AND MILLING MACHINES; FOOD PRESSES; GENERATORS; HIGH PRESSURE WASHERS; WOOD WORKING MACHINES; RAMMERS; RIVETING MACHINES; WELDING MACHINES; SPRINKLING MACHINES; CONCRETE CUTTING MACHINES; GRASS CUTTING MACHINES; SEEDING MACHINES; AND PARTS, ACCESSORIES, FITTINGS AND SHAFTS FOR THESE MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |