USPTO serial 76028332
SCREENBLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCREENBLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn S. Fruchter
LYNN S FRUCHTER COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action figures; dolls and doll clothing and accessories; battery operated toy vehicles, board and card games, toy vehicles and accessories, costume masks, dart games sets, die cast vehicles, doll trunks and cases, educational toys for children, comprising, crystal climbing shapes and blocks and electronic educational game machines for children, hobby craft kits, comprising beads and wires for making toy jewelry, kites, wind socks for decorative purposes, kits for making model airplanes and cars, musical toys and toy instruments, playsets, plush toys, pre-school playsets, puppets, puzzles, radio controlled toy vehicles, handheld electronic games, role playing sets, toy construction sets, activity sets consisting of mazes, shape puzzles and matching set games, comprising figures with detachable components to be matched to like figures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |