USPTO serial 76028505
SOLACE PER AQUA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLACE PER AQUA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry W. McFarland
SUSAN C DUNNPO BOX 1086RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | acupuncture services, aromatherapy services, astrology consultation, bar services, beauty salons, cafes, cosmetic and color analysis, flower arranging, food and nutrition consultation, gift wrapping, hair cutting, hair styling, hairdressing salons, hairdressing services, health resorts, health spas, hotel services, hotel concierge services, hotel services for preferred customers, imprinting messages on t-shirts, manicuring, massage, personal gift selection for others, personal shopping for others, physical fitness consultation, preparation of customized gift baskets with selected items regarding a particular occasion or theme, printing or graphic art design, providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions, providing fashion information, providing hot tub facilities, rating of accommodations, resort hotels, restaurants, skin care salons, snack bars and tanning salons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |