USPTO serial 76028612
BUILD-IT AND FORGET-IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUILD-IT AND FORGET-IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELL PC2111 EISENHOWER AVE STE 406ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | WOOD SUBSTITUTES, NAMELY, RECYCLED PLASTIC DECK BOARDS AND RECYCLED PLASTIC BOARDS FOR OUTDOOR CONSTRUCTION USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |