Drawing for HUB724.COM

USPTO serial 76028701

HUB724.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUB724.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paula J. Krasny

PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH DRONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services rendered through the Internet, namely, insurance brokerage services, insurance consulting services, risk management services, insurance risk management services; life and health insurance brokerage services; mortgage brokerage services; brokerage of guaranteed investment certificates, mutual funds, segregated funds, and bonds and stocksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 13, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 13, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 13, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 13, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 10, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 19, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 7, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 28, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 3, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 3, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 23, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 14, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance