USPTO serial 76029072
ORBITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORBITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAYREK V. DINEFF
LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for providing travel information and maps and for booking and checking travel reservations | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Newsletters, pamphlets, magazines, books, instruction manuals, user guides and reference guides all in the fields of travel, computers, and electronic communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dunc, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Orbitz, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Orbitz, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ORBITZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |