USPTO serial 76029297
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SE-114 85 STOCKHOLM, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW, LTD820 W JACKSON BLVDCHICAGO, IL 60607UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software featuring search engines and reports generation functions for searching, retrieving and selecting data from multiple sources | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, magazines and newsletters in the fields of information technology and intellectual property | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising agencies, namely, promoting services of information technology and intellectual property, through the distribution of printed and audio promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion advise; business information services; business management and consultation; all the above mentioned services provided both online and otherwise | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing online newsletters, magazines, books and journals in the field of information technology and intellectual property; compilation, creation and maintenance of a register of domain names; legal services provided both online and otherwise | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |