USPTO serial 76029494
CODE JELLYBEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CODE JELLYBEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wychwood Park Productions, Inc.
Toronto, Ontario M6G2V5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Ducatman
ROBERT P DUCATMAN JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUEN POINT901 LAKESIDE AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ATHLETIC SHOES, TENNIS WEAR, NAMELY, TENNIS SHORTS, TENNIS SHIRTS, AND TENNIS HATS, GYM SHORTS, GYM SUITS, SPORT SOCKS, TRACK SUITS AND JOGGING SUITS, BASEBALL CAPS, BEANIES WITH WINDMILLS, MAGICIANS' HATS AND SORCERER'S HATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | BASEBALL BATS, BASEBALLS, GOLF BAGS, GOLF CLUBS, TENNIS BALLS, TENNIS RACKETS, ROLLER SKATES, BEACH BALLS, TOY FLYING DISCS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |