USPTO serial 76029540
TEDRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHIE, BRANDEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEDRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald J. Lenkszus
DONALD J LENKSZUS DONALD J LENKSZUS, PCP O BOX 3064CAREFREE, AZ 85377UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL SWITCHING NETWORKS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS PATHS BETWEEN PLURALITIES OF OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SOURCES; OPTICAL SWITCHING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR ROUTING OF OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SIGNALS; OPTICAL NETWORK CONTROL AND SIGNAL PROCESSORS; MULTIPLE WAVELENGTH LASERS NOT FOR MEDICAL USE AND COMPONENT PARTS THEREOF; INTEGRATED OPTIC CIRCUITS; OPTICAL RECEIVERS; OPTICAL TRANSMITTERS; OPTICAL TRANSCEIVERS, OPTICAL CROSS-CONNECTS; OPTICAL ADD/DROP MULTIPLEXERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR OPTICAL FIBER COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS THAT ARE HYBRID OPTICAL AND ELECTRONIC; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING AND MANAGING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, OPTICAL FIBER COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS THAT ARE HYBRID OPTICAL AND ELECTRONIC | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |