USPTO serial 76029658
WORKFORCE ARCHITECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORKFORCE ARCHITECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T. Patula
TIMOTHY T PATULA PATULA & ASSOCIATES116 S MICHIGAN AVE 14TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | human resource and human capital management services, namely-- human resource consulting, research and analysis, database collection and management and publication of human resource data and statistics; conducting for others pre-employment screening and testing of potential employees; information technology services, namely, development and testing of software and hardware, engineering, technical writing, web site development and testing and related consulting services; staffing and outsourcing of various data processing operations, employment services, namely, permanent and temporary recruitment and placement of personnel; workforce management services; court reporting services, namely, stenographic and electronic transcription services, reporting and transcription services including the recording, transcription and delivery of testimony and other verbal, non-verbal and visual communications and related support services; document summarization services and litigation support services related to documents; providing temporary attorneys, paralegals and support personnel to law firms and corporate and governmental law departments; providing multimedia testing and evaluation systems for measuring skill levels of temporary and permanent employees; educational services, namely, training of employees and others in workplace skills and in the prevention of workplace injuries and consultation; conducting studies and surveys on workforce patterns and current trends in the workforce; personnel recruitment and management, contract staffing services, career consulting, career management, human resource consulting, management consulting, employment outplacement and employment related services including recruiting, interviewing and hiring via the Internet and any global interconnected communication system; creating, maintaining and publishing a set of indexes which measure the economic value and performance of a workforce; analysis of benchmarking and performance of human resource functions; publishing and disseminating surveys of the economic value and performance of a workforce and the benchmarking and performance of human resource functions; talent assessment and development and executive counseling; outplacement and employment counseling; employment database maintenance; business consultation services in the fields of personnel management, placement, recruitment and relocation; management assistance services; executive recruitment and executive search services; computer software for organizing and maintaining business tasks in the field of software applications; human capital benchmarking services, namely automating data capture, extraction and load process for human capital metrics and human resources benchmarking, establishing and generating metrics for internal company components, and accessing benchmark databases via the Internet; human capital consulting and benchmarking; human capital metrics services, namely providing access to and use of human capital metrics, benchmarking formulas, and data elements in data extraction, reporting and display software and/or systems, to establish and generate metrics for internal company components, allowing transfer of data elements on an automated electronic basis to obtain competitive industry benchmarking information, and accessing benchmarking databases via the Internet; human capital consulting and benchmarking; employee attraction, retention and analysis programs; workshops and seminars relating to issues regarding human resource and human capital | ACTIVE | Jul 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |