USPTO serial 76030049
FUZOLENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUZOLENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mount Olive, NJ
Mount Olive, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN W STEGMAN
JACQUELINE M OSTROSKI BASF CORPORATION3000 CONTINENTAL DR - NMOUNT OLIVE, NJ 07828-1234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Coating in the nature of paints designed to bond with metal surfaces and used to promote adhesion of topical coatings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |