USPTO serial 76030940
CUTLITE PENTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUTLITE PENTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cecelia M. Perry
CECELIA M PERRY SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cutting machines for metals, wood, plastics, leather, fabrics; Nd-- Yag laser and CO2 laser cutting machines for metals, wood, plastics, leather, fabrics; Nd-- Yag laser and CO2 laser cutting machines for metals, wood, plastics, leather, fabrics provided with numerical control devices, the laser system including laser source, electronic controlling boards and beam delivery apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Cutting apparatus and devices for metals, wood, plastics, leather, fabrics; Nd-- Yag laser and CO2 laser cutting machines for metals, wood, plastics, leather, fabrics; Nd-- Yag laser and CO2 laser cutting apparatus and devices for metals, wood, plastics, leather, fabrics provided with numerical control devices, the laser system including laser source, electronic controlling boards and beam delivery apparatus; numerical control devices for the abovementioned cutting apparatus and devices for metals, wood, plastics, leather, fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |