USPTO serial 76030955
MOST SIGNIFICANT BITS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOST SIGNIFICANT BITS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Walker
PATRICIA A WALKER WALKER & JOCKE231 S BROADWAYMEDINA, OH 44256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PERSONAL COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF ANIMALS AND WILDLIFE, AUDIO AND VIDEO APPLICATIONS, BIBLES AND RELIGION, BUSINESS CLIP ART, COOKING DICTIONARY AND ENCYCLOPEDIA, EDUCATIONAL ELECTRONICS, ENTERTAINMENT GAMES, GARDENING AND LANDSCAPING, GENEALOGY, GRAPHICS AND DESKTOP PUBLISHING, GREETING CARD MAKERS, HOBBIES, HOME DESIGN AND REMODELING, INTERNET AND TOOLS, LANGUAGES, MAPS AND TRAVEL, MEDICAL AND HEALTH, OFFICE APPLICATIONS, PROGRAMMING, REFERENCE, SHAREWARE, TOOLS, UTILITIES AND TUTORIALS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1989 |
| 028 | COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |