Drawing for DRYMAXX

USPTO serial 76032591

DRYMAXX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DRYMAXX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MALCOLM S. McNEIL

MALCOLM S MCNEIL LAW OFFICE OF MALCOLM S MCNEIL1901 AVE OF THE STARS STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Fabrics, namely coated, waterproof fabricsACTIVEJan 1, 1994
025clothing, namely ski wear, outdoor wear, snowboard wear; shoes, namely sports and leisure-time footwear, camping and hiking shoesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVEDJan 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance