USPTO serial 76032746
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Professional Career Development, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Professional Career Development, Inc.
Professional Career Development, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Professional Career Development, Inc.
PROFESSIONAL CAREER DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, LLC
NORCROSS, GA
Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL CAREER DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, LLC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
India E. Vincent, Esq.
India E. Vincent, Esq. Burr & Forman LLP420 North 20th StreetSuite 3400Birmingham, AL 35203| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing college courses of instruction at the undergraduate level; providing college courses through correspondence | EXPIRED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |