Drawing for ASHWORTH COLLEGE

USPTO serial 76032746

ASHWORTH COLLEGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2603090Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 30, 2002
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASHWORTH COLLEGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

India E. Vincent, Esq.

India E. Vincent, Esq. Burr & Forman LLP420 North 20th StreetSuite 3400Birmingham, AL 35203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, providing college courses of instruction at the undergraduate level; providing college courses through correspondenceEXPIRED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Jun 30, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jun 30, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jun 17, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jun 6, 2008ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 10, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
May 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 9, 2002REINREINSTATED
Feb 28, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Feb 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 25, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 4, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jan 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 5, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance