USPTO serial 76032843
APPARELBUY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2003
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with APPARELBUY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | OPERATING AN ON-LINE MARKETPLACE FOR RETAILERS OF APPAREL AND MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS THEREOF | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 18, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |