USPTO serial 76032937
STARGUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARGUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald A DiCerbo
Ronald A DiCerbo MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY500 WEST MADISON STREET34th FloorCHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA TRANSMISSION HARDWARE, NAMELY, DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA MULTIPLEXERS, MULTIMEDIA RECEIVERS, EXPANSION MODULES, ROUTERS, AUDIO AND VIDEO CODECS; SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA ENCODING AND DECODING, AND DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION NETWORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF MULTIMEDIA SATELLITE NETWORK SOFTWARE, BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, MULTIMEDIA SATELLITE NETWORK ACCESS CONTROL SOFTWARE, STORE AND FORWARD DELIVERY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE THEREFOR; SATELLITE TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, AND CUSTOM CONFIGURED SATELLITE TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, COMPRISED OF MULTIPLEXERS, MULTIMEDIA RECEIVERS, ROUTERS, EXPANSION MODULES, AUDIO MULTI-CHANNEL RECEIVERS, AND SOFTWARE FOR MAINTAINING AND OPERATING MULTIMEDIA TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS FROM A CENTRAL LOCATION; MULTIPLEXERS; MULTI-CHANNEL RECEIVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE OF DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA TRANSMISSION HARDWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | SATELLITE TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, IMAGES AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT TO MEDIA BROADCASTERS, NAMELY, BROADCASTERS OF RADIO, TELEPHONE, CELLULAR TELEPHONE, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT (PDA), INTERNET, TELEVISION, CABLE TELEVISION, AND SATELLITE TELEVISION MEDIA AND NOT DIRECTLY TO TELEVISION VIEWERS; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF STREAMING AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS TO MEDIA BROADCASTERS NAMELY, BROADCASTERS OF RADIO TELEPHONE, CELLULAR TELEPHONE, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT (PDA), INTERNET, TELEVISION, CABLE TELEVISION, AND SATELLITE TELEVISION MEDIA AND NOT DIRECTLY TO TELEVISION VIEWERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PREPARATION OF CONTENT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN DIGITAL FORMAT TO MEDIA BROADCASTERS, NAMELY, BROADCASTERS OF RADIO, TELEPHONE, CELLULAR TELEPHONE, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT (PDA), INTERNET, TELEVISION, CABLE TELEVISION, AND SATELLITE TELEVISION MEDIA AND NOT DIRECTLY TO TELEVISION VIEWERS, NAMELY CROSS-PLATFORM CONVERSION OF DIGITAL CONTENT INTO OTHER FORMS OF DIGITAL CONTENT, NAMELY PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES, ARTWORK, VIDEO SEGMENTS, MOVIES; MAINTENANCE OF DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA TRANSMISSION SOFTWARE; DESIGN OF SATELLITE NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY CONSULTATION FOR PRODUCTION, PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF DIGITAL CONTENT AND WEB SITES; ENGINEERING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by StarGuide Digital Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by StarGuide Digital Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STARGUIDE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |