USPTO serial 76032971
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Stratus Computer Systems S.a.r.l., Luxembourg Swiss Branch
Baar, CH
Other trademarks owned by Stratus Computer Systems S.a.r.l., Luxembourg Swiss Branch
Stratus Computer Systems S.a.r.l., Luxembourg Swiss Branch
Baar, CH
Other trademarks owned by Stratus Computer Systems S.a.r.l., Luxembourg Swiss Branch
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. McKenna
ELIZABETH A WALKER KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAMSTATE ST FINANCIAL CTRONE LINCOLN STBOSTON, MA 02111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mission Critical and High Availability General Purpose Information Processing Equipment Comprising Processors, Memories, Peripheral Controllers and parts therefor and computer operating programs therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Publications, Namely Instruction and Operations Manuals on the Use of Mission Critical and High Availability General Purpose Information Processing Equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and Repair of Mission Critical and High Availability Information Processing Equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing Telecommunications Connections To a Global Computer Network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training in the Use and Operation of Mission Critical and High Availability Information Processing Equipment; Educational Services Namely Conducting Classes, Workshops and Seminars in the Field of Mission Critical and High Availability Information Processing Equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer Software Installation; Computer Programming For Others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |