Drawing for Serial No. 76033265

USPTO serial 76033265

Serial No. 76033265

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76033265?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004All-purpose lubricants derived from petroleum, fuel oil derived from petroleum, crude oil; refined petroleum products, namely, gasoline; petroleum products, namely, industrial oils and greases, industrial lubricants, automotive greases, motors oil, carnauba wax, hydrocarbon fuels in liquid and gaseous form, fuel for motor vehicles, namely, gasoline and diesel fuel, fuels for aircraft, fuel oil, namely, ethane, butane and propane; petroleum illuminants, namely, candles, and synthetic all-purpose lubricantsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 5, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 23, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 5, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 23, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance