USPTO serial 76033423
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN T SHELTON
STEVEN T SHELTON CLIFFORD CHANCE ROGERS & WELLS LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used to facilitate credit management services, gas and other commodities trading services; gas and other commodities brokerage services; gas and other commodities credit derivative services; commercial lending services; banking services, and financial management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Gas and other commodities trading for others; gas and other commodities brokerage services; gas and other commodities credit derivative services; commercial lending services; banking services; financial management services, namely credit management | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |