Drawing for BIRDOUT

USPTO serial 76033442

BIRDOUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIRDOUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Lydon

JAMES C LYDON100 DAINGERFIELD RD STE 100ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal barriers for repelling access to an area by winged animals; portable metal buildings specially designed for repelling access to an area by winged animals; prefabricated metal buildings specially designed for repelling access to an area by winged animalsACTIVE
009Electric barriers and electric impulse barriers for repelling access to an area by winged animalsACTIVE
019Non-metal barriers for repelling access to an area by winged animals; portable non-metal buildings specially designed for repelling access to an area by winged animals; pre-fabricated nonmetal buildings specially designed for repelling access to an area by winged animalsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 17, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance