USPTO serial 76033574
REQUEST4BID.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOONEYHAM, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REQUEST4BID.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert S. Chu
ALBERT S CHU CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, PS701 FIFTH AVE70TH FL COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in reverse auction services, namely, for use in allowing registered buyers to post via a global computer network purchasing requirements by line item in either an open or private auction format, while concomitantly allowing registered vendors the opportunity to bid to provide those goods and services via a global computer network; computer software for use in credit card verification services to keep information secure on a global computer network and for use in facilitating e-commerce business solution and consulting services, namely, arranging, coordinating and implementing the business to business sale of goods and services; computer software for use in allowing registered buyers to build line item-based estimates from product databases and for use in providing access to computer software and information databases maintained and compiled on a global computer network, including information regarding credit worthiness of registered users; computer software for use in providing an on-line searchable ordering guide for locating, organizing and presenting goods and services of others and for use in database aggregation, integration and management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |