Drawing for EPROPOSE.COM

USPTO serial 76034228

EPROPOSE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WATERS-PEREZ,KATHYRN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPROPOSE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROSE A. HAGAN

ROSE A HAGAN FISH & RICHARDSON, PC2200 SAND HILL RD STE 100MENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation, business management consultation, business planning, and business management planning; business marketing consulting, providing business information for the creation and maintenance of online intra-and cross-enterprises marketplaces; market research and analysis; operating online business to business marketplaces for sellers of goods and services; promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing cross-market advertisements on electronic websites accessed through the global computer network; licensing of computer softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance