USPTO serial 76034252
#363 SEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with #363 SEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Highland Park, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel E. Lutzker
JOEL E LUTZKER SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing consumers with information about others' products and services by means of toll free telephone service | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |