USPTO serial 76034916
STICKY NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STICKY NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Greeley
PAUL D GREELEY OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE, LLPONE LANDMARK SQ 9TH FLSTAMFORD, CT 06901-2682UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer e-commerce software that creates a global computer network navigation system (through which information is organized and presented in graphical and contextual manner) enabling an exchange of information, links, products and purchase offers and other electronic business transactions that may be downloaded from a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing search engines for creating, accessing and searching data and information on a global computer network; hosting of web site of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; designing and implementing network web pages and web sites for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |