Drawing for E-CAPTURE

USPTO serial 76035097

E-CAPTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-CAPTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph T. Nabor

JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE STSTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs stored on tapes, discs, diskettes, CD-ROM and other machine-readable media, namely for optical scanning, data capture, image capturing and automatic form processing; computers, computer memories, computer monitors, computer keyboards, computer printers, optical scanners, computer chips and microprocessors; parts and fittings for all of the before mentioned goodsACTIVE
038Computer supported transmission/transfer of messages and pictures; electronic mail services; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; broadcasting database information via a global computer network; providing an on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning optical scanning, data capture, image capturing and automatic form processingACTIVE
042Computer services, namely related to optical scanning, data capture, image capturing and automatic form processing; computer system analysis; computer programming for others; design of computer hardware for others; design of computer software for others; design of websites for others; installation of computer software/computer programs; computer consultation in the field of computer hardware; maintenance of computer software/computer programs; leasing of computer software/computer programs; computer time-sharing services; recovery of computer data; leasing of computer modems and leasing of computersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 22, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 22, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Dec 16, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 11, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance