Drawing for ORCHESTREAM ENTERPRISE

USPTO serial 76035332

ORCHESTREAM ENTERPRISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ORCHESTREAM ENTERPRISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert H. Finn

HERBERT H FINN LAW OFFICE OF DICK AND HARRIS181 W MADISON STSTE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, USE IN MANAGING COMPUTER NETWORKS; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONSACTIVE
035LICENSING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE RELATING TO THE FIELD OF NETWORK MANAGEMENTACTIVE
038COMMUNICATIONS BY COMPUTER TERMINALS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA MESSAGES AND DOCUMENTS VIA A COMPUTER TERMINAL; COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; VOICE AND DATA COMMUNICATION SERVICES UTILIZING A HIGH-SPEED FIBRE OPTIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; AND PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONSACTIVE
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE CUSTOMIZATION AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES RELATING TO THE AFORESAID SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER NETWORK MANAGEMENT VIA WEB PAGES ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance