Drawing for 24 BY FOREVER

USPTO serial 76035431

24 BY FOREVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 24 BY FOREVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca B. Lederhouse

ILENE B TANNEN ESQ JONES DAY222 E 41ST STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial management and investment management servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Sep 24, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 4, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 26, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 8, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 24, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 24, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 10, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 21, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 22, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 30, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance