USPTO serial 76036004
LIQUICORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIQUICORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN G LINIHAN
MARTIN G LINIHAN HODGSON RUSS LLPONE M & T PLZ STE 2000BUFFALO, NY 14203-2391UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | NON-METAL SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR USE IN TRANSPORTING OBJECTS CONTAINING LIQUID, COLLOIDAL, AND SUSPENDED PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNICOR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hacikyan, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Hacikyan, Michael
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named LIQUICORE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |