USPTO serial 76036252
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lalitha Mani
LALITHA MANI PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVESTE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting services; business management consulting services by means of a global computer network in the field of ecommerce, sales, esales, and web-based sales; computer consulting services; technical consulting services in the field of ecommerce, sales, esales, and web-based sales by means of a global computer network; providing an interactive website by means of a global computer network for third parties in the field of sales, esales, and web-based sales; providing shared databases, online email and chat communications, information, educational materials, demonstrations, examples and resources; providing sales, advertising, and marketing services for others in the field of sales, esales, and web-based sales by means of a global computer network; promoting the goods and services of others over a global computer network in the field of sales, esales, and web-based sales; market research services in the field of sales, esales, and web-based sales by means of a global computer network; providing service bureau services in the field of sales, esales, and web-based sales by means of a global computer network; computerized on-line ordering featuring sales, esales, and web-based sales by means of a global computer network; providing an on-line commercial information directory; providing a searchable database in the field of business information available via a global computer network; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network; database management services; and computer services, namely, providing directories for telephone numbers, business addresses, electronic mail addresses, network home page addresses, addresses and telephone numbers of people | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |