Drawing for HIFUSIONBLAST

USPTO serial 76036333

HIFUSIONBLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIFUSIONBLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Willsey, Esq.

PETER J WILLSEY ESQ COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE FREEDOM SQ RESTON TOWN CTR11951 FREEDOM DRRESTON, VA 20190-5601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communications services, namely, an integrated broadcasting and messaging service for facilitating the transmission of text, voice and data via local and global computer networks, telephone networks and wireless communications devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 12, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 12, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 12, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 5, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 13, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 25, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance