Drawing for AUDIOMONTAGE

USPTO serial 76036338

AUDIOMONTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIOMONTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AUDIO TAPES, CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS CONTAINING PRE-RECORDED MUSIC AND OTHER AUDIO MATERIALSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 12, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 12, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 31, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance