USPTO serial 76036815
WINCIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINCIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard L. Kleinke
BERNARD L KLEINKE FOLEY & LARDNER402 W BROADWAY FL 23SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3542UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT FOR HEALTHCARE FACILITIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |