USPTO serial 76036830
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
80539 Muenchen, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Mayer
RICHARD L MAYERONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE ORDERING OF AUTOMOBILES AND OTHER VEHICLES; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE INTERACTIVE DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOBILE AND OTHER VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING; PREPARING AND DISSEMINATING ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS TO FACILITATE AUTOMOBILE AND OTHER VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING; ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD ADVERTISING IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOBILE AND OTHER VEHICLES; COMPUTERIZED DATA BASE MANAGEMENT IN THE NATURE OF INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOBILE AND OTHER VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING; PROVIDING SHOPPERS' GUIDE INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOBILE AND OTHER VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING; AND REFERRALS IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOBILE AND OTHER VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |