USPTO serial 76037087
BRINGING ORDER TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBINSON, ELLIOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRINGING ORDER TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Lowe
DAVID A LOWE BLACK LOWE & GRAHAMN PLLC816 2ND AVESEATTLE, WA 98104-1502UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software and user manuals sold as a unit for use with operations support systems, namely, computer desk top integration, data processing services, and application service provider (ASP) featuring software in the field operations support systems, namely, computer desk top integration, data and process management, and web accessibility systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing computer systems and software for others; updating computer software for others; services related to the sale, installation, operation, maintenance, security, and repair of computer hardware and software, namely, facilitating web-based user interface to multiple computer applications, data processing services, and Application service provider (ASP) featuring software in the field operations support systems, namely, computer desk top integration, data and process management, and web accessibility systems; networking services for others over a global computer network, namely, integration of computer systems and networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Counterpart, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Counterpart, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRINGING ORDER TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |