USPTO serial 76037451
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Brown
MICHAEL J BROWN CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT ET AL101 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10178-0061UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE, INCLUDING SOFTWARE FOR THE CONTROL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY MARKETING AND SALES PERSONNEL TO MONITOR AND TRACK A COMPANY'S MARKETING AND SALES ACTIVITIES NAMELY, SCHEDULING OF SALES CALLS, TRACKING PROMOTIONS AND WORK FLOW, PROJECT COORDINATION AND MONITORING SALES FORCE ACTIVITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | SOFTWARE MANUALS, INFORMATION LEAFLETS, BUSINESS PAPER, BOOKLETS, LEAFLETS AND MANUALS FEATURING INFORMATION ON MONITORING AND TRACKING A COMPANY'S MARKETING AND SALES ACTIVITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES; MARKETING SERVICES- BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTATION ON THE STRUCTURING AND EFFICIENT ORGANIZATION OF MARKETING AND SALES DEPARTMENTS WITHIN A COMPANY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND DATA PROCESSING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |