USPTO serial 76037543
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
City and County of San Francisco
MUNICIPAL RAILWAY DEPARTMENT ATTN MAGGIE LYNCH401 VAN NESS AVE ROOM 333ASAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper tickets | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |