USPTO serial 76037599
ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA PART II
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2003
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA PART II?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA Part II, LLC
Oradell, NJ
Other trademarks owned by ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA Part II, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHERINE L. MCDANIEL, ESQ.
SIMON BOCK KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 2600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED AUDIO RECORDINGS AND VIDEO RECORDINGS ON CD-ROM DISKS AND VIDEO CASSETTES ON THE SUBJECT OF POPULAR MUSIC | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 1991 |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY SOUVENIR PROGRAMS CONCERNING BIOGRAPHICAL BOOKS, BROCHURES, MAGAZINES AND PAMPHLETS PERTAINING TO [ ENTERTAINMENT ] * ENTERTAINERS * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 1991 |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, RENDERING LIVE VOCAL AND MUSICAL CONCERT PERFORMANCES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LYNNE, JEFFREY
- Other trademarks owned by LYNNE, JEFFREY
- Other trademarks owned by LYNNE, JEFFREY
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA Part II, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA PART II
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |