USPTO serial 76037850
VORTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VORTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM D JACKSON
WILLIAM D JACKSON LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | AEROSOL-TYPE CONTAINER CONTAINING A COMPRESSED FLUID CLEANING COMPOSITION FOR REMOVING CONTAMINANTS, NAMELY, DUST AND DIRT, FROM SURFACES INCORPORATING ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NAMELY, CIRCUIT BOARDS AND ELECTRIC INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |