Drawing for EXCAL

USPTO serial 76038097

EXCAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2661333Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 17, 2002
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with EXCAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele M. Glessner

Michele M. Glessner Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP301 S. College Street, Suite 3500Charlotte, NC 28202-6050United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products, namely calcium carbonate from limestone, marble and calcite in the form of powders and granules having calcium carbonate as the principle ingredient for use in the paint, plastic and rubber industriesACTIVEApr 15, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2023NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Oct 4, 2023RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 4, 202389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 29, 2023EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2023PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9
Sep 21, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 15, 2023E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Feb 8, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 25, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED
Jun 14, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 14, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 12, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2013EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 13, 2012PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9
Dec 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 15, 201289AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Nov 15, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Feb 2, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 4, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Dec 26, 2007815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Dec 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 17, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 7, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance