Drawing for ECAMERABAGS

USPTO serial 76038839

ECAMERABAGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECAMERABAGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. HUGHES

MICHAEL J HUGHES IPLO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICES1901 S BASCOM AVE STE 660CAMPBELL, CA 95008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ON-LINE RETAIL OUTLET FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC CASES AND PARTS THEREFORACTIVEJul 31, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 4, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 3, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 3, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 10, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB—
Apr 22, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB—
Apr 22, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB—
Apr 22, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB—
Apr 16, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance