USPTO serial 76038995
EID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy B. Merrill
NANCY B MERRILL TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC1700 LINCOLN ST STE 1400DENVER, CO 80203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Customer interaction management and customer relationship management services, namely services which focus on receiving and responding to general inquiries, pre-sales requests collateral requests, sales requests, provisioning requests, technical support, billing inquiry and adjustment, account maintenance, collections, customer retention, inquiries of customers and others and in the delivery of information necessary for the provision of such services; sales support services, services in the definition, design, development, implementation and evaluation of programs to evaluate and improve the operational performance of products services, access to information and processes of others | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 2000 |
| 041 | Education services, namely, training courses and seminars in the field of providing customer interaction management and customer relationship management services and the definition design, development, evaluation and creation of remote learning and training programs over a variety of media for others | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 2000 |
| 042 | Computer programming services; multimedia technology application service provider services; systems integration services; information delivery and storage consulting services- website design, development, performance and consulting services; internet, extranet and Intranet consulting services; web-enabled e-business application development; design development and implementation of on-line libraries; design, development and implementation of computer-based system, process and employee performance assessment services; database development services; technical consultation and implementation services-product research and development for others; and computer disaster recovery planning services | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |