USPTO serial 76039039
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Stevens
SCOTT J STEVENS BANK ONE CTR TWRWOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON, MORIARTY & M111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEVISION SETS; DIGITAL VIDEO DISC PLAYERS; RADIOS; DISPLAY DEVICES FOR RECEIVING AND DISPLAYING ELECTRONICALLY PUBLISHED WORKS; DIGITAL STILL CAMERAS; CABLE TELEVISION RECEIVERS; DIGITAL AUDIO AND VIDEO RECEIVERS; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, INTERFACE DEVICES FOR ACCESSING A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TELEVISION PROGRAMMING; PROVIDING NEWS, SPORTS, WEATHER, AND ENTERTAINMENT INFORMATION BY A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING ENTERTAINMENT INFORMATION BY A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |