Drawing for VALUSTAR

USPTO serial 76039348

VALUSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALUSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Kelly

JOHN E KELLY KELLY BAUERSFELD LOWRY & KELLEY, LLP6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-7704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY MUFFLERS, EXHAUST PIPES, AND EXHAUST CLAMPS AND HANGERSACTIVEMar 15, 2000
012AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY BRAKES, BRAKE SHOES, DISC BRAKE PADS, SHOCK ABSORBERS, SUSPENSIONS, SUSPENSION STRUTS, SUSPENSION COIL SPRINGS, WHEEL CYLINDERS, WHEEL BEARINGS, CV JOINTS AND DRIVE AXLESACTIVEMar 15, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 9, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 8, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 12, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 19, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance