USPTO serial 76039374
AKTIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2003
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AKTIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BUNKYO-KU, TOKYO, JP
BUNKYO-KU, TOKYO, JP
BUNKYO-KU, TOKYO, JP
KANAGAWA-KEN, JP
Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | remote controllers containing software used for remotely controlling home theatre audio/visual apparatus and components thereof, namely, sound amplifiers, loud speakers, radios, audio receivers and video receivers, sound recording machines, phonograph record players, audio cassette recorders, video cassette recorders, compact disc players, DVD players and televisions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DENON CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by DENON, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by DENON, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by D & M HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Columbia, Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AKTIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |