Drawing for AVENTERRA

USPTO serial 76039385

AVENTERRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVENTERRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Kelly

DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate services, namely, real estate agencies, real estate brokerage, leasing of real estate, real estate investment, real estate listing, and online information services in the field of real estateACTIVE—
037Development of planned communities; planning and laying out of residential ; real estate site selection; construction planningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 20, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 2, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance