USPTO serial 76039698
PROMOTIONS.COM TRUE INTEGRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS KELLY L.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROMOTIONS.COM TRUE INTEGRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis M. Heidelberger
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAY2500 ONE LIBERTY PL1650 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PUBLICIZING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DESIGN, CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTESTS, COMPETITIONS, GIVEAWAYS AND SWEEPSTAKES; PUBLICATIONS; PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR OTHERS REGARDING THEIR CONTESTS, COMPETITIONS, GIVEAWAYS AND SWEEPSTAKES; CREATING SOLUTIONS TO INTEGRATION PROBLEMS OF ON LINE AND OFF LINE MARKETING; INTEGRATING ON LINE AND OFF LINE MARKETING; AND INTERNET DIRECT MARKETING AND TARGETING TECHNOLOGIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |